People talk a lot about “finding” great documentary characters, but I don’t really think that’s the job.
I think almost anyone can become compelling on screen if you know what to look for and how to bring it out of them.
I know that because of how many doc-inspired brand pieces I’ve made over the years. Case studies. Testimonials. Brand films. I’ve sat across from a lot of people. Some were natural characters who jumped off the screen the second the camera rolled. Others needed help getting comfortable enough for anything real to show up.
And in commercial filmmaking, you don’t always get to choose the most naturally cinematic subject. A lot of the time, the person in the chair is the person in the chair. The CEO. The CFO. The founder. The board member. The person the company has decided represents the message.
On paper, a lot of those people can feel a little stiff. A little too constructed.
What really matters is how you learn to see them.
More importantly, it matters how you frame them so the audience can start to see them too.
Because a character isn’t just someone with a good story. A character is made up of all the messy things that make people human. Contradictions. Behaviors. Quirks. Wants. Defenses. The strange little things they surround themselves with. The way they move through a room. The way a room has been arranged around them.
I think part of our job as filmmakers is to mine the landscape that makes up a person and figure out what pieces of it actually belong on screen.
And usually, contradiction is the doorway into that landscape.
Contradiction Is the Doorway
People live with multiple truths inside them all the time, even when those truths are at odds with each other. I’ve met CEOs who were simultaneously confident and fragile. CFOs who were generous and deeply controlling. Founders who spoke about innovation like missionaries but froze the second something fell outside their own control.
Those contradictions are usually where the life is.
If you can find a way to bring them out (visually, structurally, or through the interview itself) you can build a compelling frame around someone who might otherwise just come across as a polished corporate voice.
Its for that very reason that I push to interview people in their homes whenever possible, especially executives.
CEOs in particular are usually incredibly curated in how they present themselves. They’re used to projecting control. Professionalism. Confidence. Their office reflects that version of them too. It’s a performance space. Even when it’s tasteful, it’s still saying: this is who I am at work, this is what I want you to believe about me.
A home does something different.
A home puts people on their own turf. They loosen up. The posture shifts. The job starts to slip a little. And just as importantly, the environment starts talking too.
Space Tells on People
You can learn a lot from how someone lives.
Not in some cheap psychoanalytic way. More in the sense that the spaces we build around ourselves usually carry traces of what we value, what we’re trying to control, what we’re drawn to, what we’re hiding behind, and what we love enough to keep close.
I got a real lesson in that once while interviewing a very well-known figure in business and finance. Not technically a CEO, but someone who had served on the boards of major companies and helped steer them toward enormous gains. From the outside, he was exactly what you’d expect: highly controlled, extremely polished, a conservative finance guy down to the polo shirt and khakis. A person whose entire public image seemed built around numbers, precision, and confidence.
We were interviewing him about the economic outlook leading into a presidential election. The goal was to get his “objective” take on which candidate would produce the best outcomes for private equity investors.
At first, he wanted to do the interview in a neutral studio against a plain backdrop.
But eventually, after some convincing, he agreed to let us film in his home.
And when we walked in, we found the expected markers of wealth everywhere. Huge Dalmatians roaming the living room. Objects collected from around the world. Original art on the walls. The kind of space that had clearly been designed to reflect a certain level of success and curation.
All of that was useful, if obvious.
But then we found the room that actually mattered.
A Worldview Made Physical
It was a smaller room off to the side, and it was filled with miniature dioramas.
Tiny houses on little strips of turf. Winding roads. A church. A park. Small figurines placed carefully throughout. Entire neighborhoods reduced to something you could stick on a shelf. These little worlds were meticulous. They felt weirdly alive.
He told us it had been an obsession of his for years.
My DP looked at me like I was insane. Why would we ever interview a finance guy in a room like this when he was supposed to be talking about the economy?
And then it clicked for me.
Here was this man, this supposedly objective financial mind, standing inside a tiny world he had built and controlled. Vast wealth, abstracted down into a miniature America he could arrange however he wanted.
It was a worldview made physical.
Suddenly the room wasn’t random at all.
It was character.
It was subtext.
It was the closest thing we were going to get to seeing how this man actually thought.
And it gave us incredible B-roll. We filmed through the dioramas while he talked about an idealized America that didn’t really exist: one that conveniently stepped around class struggle and the systemic oppression that shapes real life in this country. The imagery did a lot of work that the interview never could on its own.
A controlled world. His world.
That’s the kind of thing I’m always looking for now.
Not just what someone says, but where their inner life leaks into the frame. What environment reveals that a plain backdrop would erase. What contradiction suddenly becomes visible once you stop treating them like “the subject” and start looking for the person.
On paper, that finance expert could have easily been just another dry interview in a plain studio. Just another guy giving his opinion on the economy. But once we actually learned how to see him, through the room, the hobby, the contradiction, the tiny world he built, the piece became something else.
Not just information.
A character.
And that’s usually the difference between a standard corporate interview and something that actually sticks with you.
-Adam
Get in on the conversation!